A bulldog of a researcher, he has been digging into the Joyce Foundation's decade-long anti-gun programs. After considerable research he is convinced that numerous efforts were made -- some successful, some not -- to:
1) Manipulate the Supreme Court
2) Buy legal scholarship, and
3) Obliterate the individual right to arms.
With that said, Mr. Hardy comes to the following conclusion:
"Voters who value the Constitution should ask whether someone who was party to that plan should be nominating future Supreme Court justices."Worse, I am sad to say that my alma mater, The Ohio State University and its (then brand new) John Glenn School of Public Affairs, was a willing participant -- or useful idiot, I'm not sure which -- in this effort.
I first met Dave at a Gun Rights Policy Conference more than a year ago. He knows his stuff, and he was one of the writers of a key amicus brief presented to the Supreme Court in the Heller/District of Columbia case.
His essay is worth reading. Then pass it on.
No comments:
Post a Comment