"Obama, disagreeing with the D.C. government and gun control advocates, declares the Second Amendment's "right of the people to keep and bear arms" applies to individuals, not just the "well-regulated militia" cited in the amendment. In the next breath, he asserts this constitutional guarantee does not preclude local "common sense" restrictions on firearms. Does the Draconian prohibition for Washington, D.C., fit that description? My attempts to get an answer have proved unavailing. The front-running Democratic presidential candidate is doing the gun dance.
"That is a dance of many Democrats, revealed by my private conversations with the party's strategists. As urban liberals, they reject constitutional protection for gun owners. As campaign managers, they want to avoid re-enacting the fate of many Democratic candidates who lost elections because of gun control advocacy. The party's House leadership last year pulled off the floor a bill for a District of Columbia congressional seat in order to save Democratic members from having to vote on a Republican amendment against the D.C. gun law."
A good read from syndicated columnist Robert Novak.
PLUS, respected researcher John Lott chimes in on the two different views of Sen. Obama and guns.
h/t to Glenn Reynolds' Instapundit
09 April 2008
Obama's 'Gun Dance'
Posted by Brent Greer at 9:05 AM
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment