Critical Historical Commentary On District of Columbia v. Heller

David Young wrote me last night to let me know he has put together some critical historical commentary regarding the DC v Heller case to be argued on March 18 before the U.S. Supreme Court.

Mr. Young notes that what all the anti-DC briefs seem to share is one thing: a general setting aside of the Bill of Rights development, and the nature, background and intent of the Second Amendment. Plus, he is stymied why a group of 15 so-called "historians" included so many errors of fact in their pro-DC brief.

Read his commentary here. Read it. Read it. Read it.

And after you read it, pass it on to someone you know.